LLMcompare

Search

Search for a command to run...

A · open · Llama / Muse

Llama 3.1 405B

Meta

B · closed · Llama / Muse

Muse Spark 1.3

Meta

0:6

overall capability wins (0 ties across 6 scored). Muse Spark 1.3 leads overall.

  • Reasoning0:4
  • Coding0:1
  • Pricing1:2
  • Specs0:1

Verdict

Muse Spark 1.3 leads coding (widest gap: +28.9 on SciCode); Muse Spark 1.3 offers ~8.2x larger context (1.0M vs 128K); Llama 3.1 405B ships open weights (Llama 3.1 Community).

  • Muse Spark 1.3 leads coding (widest gap: +28.9 on SciCode)
  • Muse Spark 1.3 offers ~8.2x larger context (1.0M vs 128K)
  • Llama 3.1 405B ships open weights (Llama 3.1 Community)
  • Muse Spark 1.3 is ~1.8x cheaper on a blended token basis than Llama 3.1 405B

Cost for 1M in + 250K out

Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.

Llama 3.1 405B
$4.38
Muse Spark 1.3
$2.31

Muse Spark 1.3 is about 1.9x cheaper on this workload.

Price per 1M tokens

Full comparison

Organization

Meta

Meta

Family

Llama / Muse

Llama / Muse

License

Llama 3.1 Community

Proprietary

Open weights

Yes

No

Release

Jul 23, 2024

Sep 2, 2026

Knowledge cutoff

-

-

API / provider

Together / Fireworks (ref.)

Meta

Modalities

text → text

text, image, video, pdf → text

Specs

Context window

128K

1.0M

B +921K

Max output

4K

-

—

Parameters

405B

—

—

Pricing

Input $/1M

$3.50

$1.25

B +$2.25

Output $/1M

$3.50

$4.25

A +$0.75

Blended $/1M (3∶1)

$3.50

$2

B +$1.50

Speed

tok/s

40

-

—

TTFT (s)

0.6

-

—

Reasoning

MMLU-Pro

73.3

—

—

GPQA Diamond

51.5

93.5

B +42.0 pts

Humanity's Last Exam

4.0

48.7

B +44.7 pts

AIME 2025

3.0

—

—

MATH-500

70.3

—

—

Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)

—

—

—

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

23.2

43.6

B +20.4 pts

AA-LCR v1.1

25.3

83.0

B +57.7 pts

CritPt

—

24.9

—

MMMU-Pro

—

—

—

IFBench

39.0

—

—

Chartography

—

—

—

Chartography (With Tools)

—

—

—

Coding

SWE-bench Verified

—

—

—

SWE-bench Pro

11.2

—

—

SWE-bench Multilingual

—

—

—

LiveCodeBench

27.7

—

—

Terminal-Bench 2.1

—

85.8

—

Aider Polyglot

—

—

—

Terminal-Bench 3

—

—

—

BigCodeBench

—

—

—

SciCode

29.9

58.8

B +28.9 pts

CursorBench

—

—

—

SWE-Rebench

—

—

—

NL2Repo-Bench

—

—

—

DeepSWE

—

—

—

WebDev Arena

—

—

—

Terminal-Bench 4.0

—

—

—

CursorBench 4.0

—

—

—

FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)

—

—

—

Arena

LMArena Elo

1,335

—

—

Llama 3.1 405B

Context
128K / 4K out
Parameters
405B
Price
$3.50 / $3.50
Speed
40 tok/s · 0.6s TTFT
Modalities
text → text
License
Llama 3.1 Community

Largest Llama 3.1 dense instruct model - still used where dense (non-MoE) weights are required.

Muse Spark 1.3

Context
1.0M
Parameters
—
Price
$1.25 / $4.25
Speed
—
Modalities
text, image, video, pdf → text
License
Proprietary

Meta's Sept 2026 coding/agentic upgrade to Muse Spark — ~20% fewer tool calls and ~25% fewer tokens than 1.2 in internal comparisons, with longer-horizon multi-workflow persistence and more proactive clarifying questions. Same 1M context and $1.25/$4.25 Meta Model API pricing as 1.2 (contributor tier $0.10/$0.20). Open weights planned but not yet released; max reasoning mode pending further safety testing.

Benchmark charts

Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.

Reasoning & knowledge

GPQA: B +42.0HLE: B +44.7AA-LCR: B +57.7Omniscience Acc.: B +20.4

Coding

SciCode: B +28.9

Pick a different pair · Back to catalog