vs
2:0
overall capability wins (0 ties across 2 scored). Ling-3.0 Flash Fin leads overall.
- Specs2:0
Verdict
Ling-3.0 Flash Fin offers ~2.0x larger context (262K vs 131K).
Cost for 1M in + 250K out
Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.
- Ling-3.0 Flash Fin
- -
- QwQ-32B
- $0.38
Price per 1M tokens
Full comparison
Organization
InclusionAI
Alibaba
Family
Other
Other
License
MIT
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Yes
Yes
Release
Sep 3, 2026
Mar 6, 2025
Knowledge cutoff
-
-
API / provider
No primary API price listed
Together / Fireworks (ref.)
Modalities
text → text
text → text
Specs
Context window
262K
131K
Max output
-
8K
Parameters
124B (5.1B act.)
32B
Pricing
Input $/1M
—
$0.30
Output $/1M
—
$0.30
Blended $/1M (3∶1)
-
$0.30
Speed
tok/s
-
55
TTFT (s)
-
1.2
Reasoning
MMLU-Pro
—
76.4
GPQA Diamond
—
59.3
Humanity's Last Exam
—
7.4
AIME 2025
—
69.5
MATH-500
—
98.0
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
—
—
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
—
—
AA-LCR v1.1
—
26.7
CritPt
—
—
MMMU-Pro
—
—
IFBench
—
38.8
Chartography
—
—
Chartography (With Tools)
—
—
Coding
SWE-bench Verified
—
—
SWE-bench Pro
—
—
SWE-bench Multilingual
—
—
LiveCodeBench
—
63.4
Terminal-Bench 2.1
—
—
Aider Polyglot
—
20.9
Terminal-Bench 3
—
—
BigCodeBench
—
—
SciCode
—
35.8
CursorBench
—
—
SWE-Rebench
—
—
NL2Repo-Bench
—
—
DeepSWE
—
—
WebDev Arena
—
—
Terminal-Bench 4.0
—
—
CursorBench 4.0
—
—
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)
—
—
Arena
LMArena Elo
—
1,336
| Metric | Ling-3.0 Flash Fin | QwQ-32B | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Organization | InclusionAI | Alibaba | — |
| Family | Other | Other | — |
| License | MIT | Apache 2.0 | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | — |
| Release | Sep 3, 2026 | Mar 6, 2025 | — |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - | — |
| API / provider | No primary API price listed | Together / Fireworks (ref.) | — |
| Modalities | text → text | text → text | — |
| Specs | |||
| Context window | 262K | 131K | A +131K |
| Max output | - | 8K | — |
| Parameters | 124B (5.1B act.) | 32B | A +92 |
| Pricing | |||
| Input $/1M | — | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/1M | — | $0.30 | — |
| Blended $/1M (3∶1) | - | $0.30 | — |
| Speed | |||
| tok/s | - | 55 | — |
| TTFT (s) | - | 1.2 | — |
| Reasoning | |||
| MMLU-Pro | — | 76.4 | — |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 59.3 | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 7.4 | — |
| AIME 2025 | — | 69.5 | — |
| MATH-500 | — | 98.0 | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | — | — | — |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy | — | — | — |
| AA-LCR v1.1 | — | 26.7 | — |
| CritPt | — | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | — | — | — |
| IFBench | — | 38.8 | — |
| Chartography | — | — | — |
| Chartography (With Tools) | — | — | — |
| Coding | |||
| SWE-bench Verified | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 63.4 | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | — | — | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9 | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3 | — | — | — |
| BigCodeBench | — | — | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.8 | — |
| CursorBench | — | — | — |
| SWE-Rebench | — | — | — |
| NL2Repo-Bench | — | — | — |
| DeepSWE | — | — | — |
| WebDev Arena | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| CursorBench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) | — | — | — |
| Arena | |||
| LMArena Elo | — | 1,336 | — |
Ling-3.0 Flash Fin
- Context
- 262K
- Parameters
- 124B (5.1B act.)
- Price
- —
- Speed
- —
- Modalities
- text → text
- License
- MIT
InclusionAI / Ant Group's finance-specialized fine-tune of Ling-3.0 Flash (124B total / 5.1B active MoE, MIT, 256K context), built with financial institutions for source-grounded financial research, multi-document analysis, valuation modeling, and spreadsheet workflows. Ant Group's model card reports evaluation on FinFIRST, FinSearchComp Verified, FinCRAFT, Finance Agent, APEX-Agents, SpreadsheetBench, and τ³-Banking without publishing numeric scores, so no benchmark values are recorded here.
QwQ-32B
- Context
- 131K / 8K out
- Parameters
- 32B
- Price
- $0.30 / $0.30
- Speed
- 55 tok/s · 1.2s TTFT
- Modalities
- text → text
- License
- Apache 2.0
Qwen reasoning specialist distilled/trained for contest math and hard STEM chains of thought.
Benchmark charts
Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.
These two models have no overlapping published benchmarks in our dataset. Compare specs and pricing instead.