vs
2:0
overall capability wins (0 ties across 2 scored). Inkling-Small leads overall.
- Specs2:0
Verdict
Inkling-Small offers ~4.0x larger context (1.0M vs 262K).
Cost for 1M in + 250K out
Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.
- Inkling-Small
- $0.94
- Ling-3.0 Flash Fin
- -
Price per 1M tokens
Full comparison
Organization
Thinking Machines
InclusionAI
Family
Other
Other
License
Apache 2.0
MIT
Open weights
Yes
Yes
Release
Jul 30, 2026
Sep 3, 2026
Knowledge cutoff
-
-
API / provider
Tinker (ref.)
No primary API price listed
Modalities
text, image, audio → text
text → text
Specs
Context window
1.0M
262K
Max output
131K
-
Parameters
276B (12B act.)
124B (5.1B act.)
Pricing
Input $/1M
$0.58
—
Output $/1M
$1.44
—
Blended $/1M (3∶1)
$0.79
-
Speed
tok/s
85
-
TTFT (s)
0.35
-
Reasoning
MMLU-Pro
—
—
GPQA Diamond
89.5
—
Humanity's Last Exam
33.3
—
AIME 2025
—
—
MATH-500
—
—
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
—
—
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
33.2
—
AA-LCR v1.1
75.7
—
CritPt
8.3
—
MMMU-Pro
74.0
—
IFBench
—
—
Chartography
—
—
Chartography (With Tools)
—
—
Coding
SWE-bench Verified
80.2
—
SWE-bench Pro
55.9
—
SWE-bench Multilingual
—
—
LiveCodeBench
—
—
Terminal-Bench 2.1
55.1
—
Aider Polyglot
—
—
Terminal-Bench 3
—
—
BigCodeBench
—
—
SciCode
49.7
—
CursorBench
—
—
SWE-Rebench
—
—
NL2Repo-Bench
—
—
DeepSWE
—
—
WebDev Arena
1,407
—
Terminal-Bench 4.0
—
—
CursorBench 4.0
—
—
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)
—
—
Arena
LMArena Elo
1,405
—
| Metric | Inkling-Small | Ling-3.0 Flash Fin | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Organization | Thinking Machines | InclusionAI | — |
| Family | Other | Other | — |
| License | Apache 2.0 | MIT | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | — |
| Release | Jul 30, 2026 | Sep 3, 2026 | — |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - | — |
| API / provider | Tinker (ref.) | No primary API price listed | — |
| Modalities | text, image, audio → text | text → text | — |
| Specs | |||
| Context window | 1.0M | 262K | A +786K |
| Max output | 131K | - | — |
| Parameters | 276B (12B act.) | 124B (5.1B act.) | A +152 |
| Pricing | |||
| Input $/1M | $0.58 | — | — |
| Output $/1M | $1.44 | — | — |
| Blended $/1M (3∶1) | $0.79 | - | — |
| Speed | |||
| tok/s | 85 | - | — |
| TTFT (s) | 0.35 | - | — |
| Reasoning | |||
| MMLU-Pro | — | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.5 | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 33.3 | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | — | — | — |
| MATH-500 | — | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | — | — | — |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy | 33.2 | — | — |
| AA-LCR v1.1 | 75.7 | — | — |
| CritPt | 8.3 | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 74.0 | — | — |
| IFBench | — | — | — |
| Chartography | — | — | — |
| Chartography (With Tools) | — | — | — |
| Coding | |||
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.2 | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | 55.9 | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 55.1 | — | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3 | — | — | — |
| BigCodeBench | — | — | — |
| SciCode | 49.7 | — | — |
| CursorBench | — | — | — |
| SWE-Rebench | — | — | — |
| NL2Repo-Bench | — | — | — |
| DeepSWE | — | — | — |
| WebDev Arena | 1,407 | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| CursorBench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) | — | — | — |
| Arena | |||
| LMArena Elo | 1,405 | — | — |
Inkling-Small
- Context
- 1.0M / 131K out
- Parameters
- 276B (12B act.)
- Price
- $0.58 / $1.44
- Speed
- 85 tok/s · 0.35s TTFT
- Modalities
- text, image, audio → text
- License
- Apache 2.0
Efficient Inkling sibling (276B / 12B active MoE) — matches or beats Inkling on many benchmarks at ~¼ the size; Apache 2.0 weights with Tinker fine-tuning access.
Ling-3.0 Flash Fin
- Context
- 262K
- Parameters
- 124B (5.1B act.)
- Price
- —
- Speed
- —
- Modalities
- text → text
- License
- MIT
InclusionAI / Ant Group's finance-specialized fine-tune of Ling-3.0 Flash (124B total / 5.1B active MoE, MIT, 256K context), built with financial institutions for source-grounded financial research, multi-document analysis, valuation modeling, and spreadsheet workflows. Ant Group's model card reports evaluation on FinFIRST, FinSearchComp Verified, FinCRAFT, Finance Agent, APEX-Agents, SpreadsheetBench, and τ³-Banking without publishing numeric scores, so no benchmark values are recorded here.
Benchmark charts
Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.
These two models have no overlapping published benchmarks in our dataset. Compare specs and pricing instead.