vs
1:0
overall capability wins (0 ties across 1 scored). Grok 4.20 leads overall.
- Pricing3:0
- Specs1:0
Verdict
Grok 4.20 offers ~2.0x larger context (1M vs 500K); Grok 4.20 is ~1.9x cheaper on a blended token basis than Grok 4.6.
- Grok 4.20 offers ~2.0x larger context (1M vs 500K)
- Grok 4.20 is ~1.9x cheaper on a blended token basis than Grok 4.6
Cost for 1M in + 250K out
Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.
- Grok 4.20
- $1.88
- Grok 4.6
- $3.50
Grok 4.20 is about 1.9x cheaper on this workload.
Price per 1M tokens
Full comparison
Organization
xAI
xAI
Family
Grok
Grok
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Open weights
No
No
Release
May 20, 2026
Aug 12, 2026
Knowledge cutoff
-
2026-02-01
API / provider
xAI
xAI
Modalities
text, image → text
text, image → text
Specs
Context window
1M
500K
Max output
64K
-
Parameters
—
1.5T
Pricing
Input $/1M
$1.25
$2
Output $/1M
$2.50
$6
Blended $/1M (3∶1)
$1.56
$3
Speed
tok/s
83
-
TTFT (s)
0.4
-
Reasoning
MMLU-Pro
—
—
GPQA Diamond
—
94.9
Humanity's Last Exam
—
42.9
AIME 2025
—
—
MATH-500
—
—
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
—
—
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
—
48.2
AA-LCR v1.1
—
80.3
CritPt
—
17.1
MMMU-Pro
—
—
IFBench
—
—
Chartography
—
—
Chartography (With Tools)
—
—
Coding
SWE-bench Verified
—
—
SWE-bench Pro
—
—
SWE-bench Multilingual
—
—
LiveCodeBench
—
—
Terminal-Bench 2.1
—
88.4
Aider Polyglot
—
—
Terminal-Bench 3
—
26.5
BigCodeBench
—
—
SciCode
—
56.5
CursorBench
—
70.8
SWE-Rebench
—
—
NL2Repo-Bench
—
—
DeepSWE
—
67.0
WebDev Arena
—
1,618
Terminal-Bench 4.0
—
20.3
CursorBench 4.0
—
—
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)
—
—
Arena
LMArena Elo
—
1,456
| Metric | Grok 4.20 | Grok 4.6 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Organization | xAI | xAI | — |
| Family | Grok | Grok | — |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | — |
| Open weights | No | No | — |
| Release | May 20, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 | — |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | 2026-02-01 | — |
| API / provider | xAI | xAI | — |
| Modalities | text, image → text | text, image → text | — |
| Specs | |||
| Context window | 1M | 500K | A +500K |
| Max output | 64K | - | — |
| Parameters | — | 1.5T | — |
| Pricing | |||
| Input $/1M | $1.25 | $2 | A +$0.75 |
| Output $/1M | $2.50 | $6 | A +$3.50 |
| Blended $/1M (3∶1) | $1.56 | $3 | A +$1.44 |
| Speed | |||
| tok/s | 83 | - | — |
| TTFT (s) | 0.4 | - | — |
| Reasoning | |||
| MMLU-Pro | — | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94.9 | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 42.9 | — |
| AIME 2025 | — | — | — |
| MATH-500 | — | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | — | — | — |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy | — | 48.2 | — |
| AA-LCR v1.1 | — | 80.3 | — |
| CritPt | — | 17.1 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | — | — | — |
| IFBench | — | — | — |
| Chartography | — | — | — |
| Chartography (With Tools) | — | — | — |
| Coding | |||
| SWE-bench Verified | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | — | 88.4 | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3 | — | 26.5 | — |
| BigCodeBench | — | — | — |
| SciCode | — | 56.5 | — |
| CursorBench | — | 70.8 | — |
| SWE-Rebench | — | — | — |
| NL2Repo-Bench | — | — | — |
| DeepSWE | — | 67.0 | — |
| WebDev Arena | — | 1,618 | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | — | 20.3 | — |
| CursorBench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) | — | — | — |
| Arena | |||
| LMArena Elo | — | 1,456 | — |
Grok 4.20
- Context
- 1M / 64K out
- Parameters
- —
- Price
- $1.25 / $2.50
- Speed
- 83 tok/s · 0.4s TTFT
- Modalities
- text, image → text
- License
- Proprietary
High-speed Grok 4.x mid-tier with 1M context at $1.25/$2.50 (doubles above 200k prompt tokens); current API snapshot is grok-4.20-0309-reasoning.
Grok 4.6
- Context
- 500K
- Parameters
- 1.5T
- Price
- $2 / $6
- Speed
- —
- Modalities
- text, image → text
- License
- Proprietary
xAI/SpaceXAI's August 2026 flagship (1.5T-parameter) tuned for long-running agents and ambitious interactive/visual work — 500k context at $2/$6, matches GPT-5.6 Sol on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (61). A fast variant is available at 2x price.
Benchmark charts
Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.
These two models have no overlapping published benchmarks in our dataset. Compare specs and pricing instead.