vs
0:2
overall capability wins (0 ties across 2 scored). Grok Build 0.1 leads overall.
- Pricing0:3
- Speed0:2
- Specs0:2
Verdict
Grok Build 0.1 offers ~2.0x larger context (256K vs 131K); Grok Build 0.1 allows ~2.0x more max output (64K vs 33K); Grok Build 0.1 is ~4.8x cheaper on a blended token basis than Grok 3.
- Grok Build 0.1 offers ~2.0x larger context (256K vs 131K)
- Grok Build 0.1 allows ~2.0x more max output (64K vs 33K)
- Grok Build 0.1 is ~4.8x cheaper on a blended token basis than Grok 3
Cost for 1M in + 250K out
Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.
- Grok 3
- $6.75
- Grok Build 0.1
- $1.50
Grok Build 0.1 is about 4.5x cheaper on this workload.
Price per 1M tokens
Full comparison
Organization
xAI
xAI
Family
Grok
Grok
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Open weights
No
No
Release
Feb 17, 2025
Jul 1, 2026
Knowledge cutoff
-
-
API / provider
xAI
xAI
Modalities
text, image → text
text → text
Specs
Context window
131K
256K
Max output
33K
64K
Parameters
—
—
Pricing
Input $/1M
$3
$1
Output $/1M
$15
$2
Blended $/1M (3∶1)
$6
$1.25
Speed
tok/s
75
120
TTFT (s)
0.45
0.28
Reasoning
MMLU-Pro
79.9
—
GPQA Diamond
69.3
—
Humanity's Last Exam
4.1
—
AIME 2025
58.0
—
MATH-500
87.0
—
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
—
—
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
28.9
—
AA-LCR v1.1
58.0
—
CritPt
—
—
MMMU-Pro
—
—
IFBench
46.9
—
Chartography
—
—
Chartography (With Tools)
—
—
Coding
SWE-bench Verified
—
—
SWE-bench Pro
—
—
SWE-bench Multilingual
—
—
LiveCodeBench
42.5
—
Terminal-Bench 2.1
—
—
Aider Polyglot
53.3
—
Terminal-Bench 3
—
—
BigCodeBench
—
—
SciCode
36.8
—
CursorBench
—
—
SWE-Rebench
—
—
NL2Repo-Bench
—
—
DeepSWE
—
—
WebDev Arena
—
—
Terminal-Bench 4.0
—
—
CursorBench 4.0
—
—
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)
—
—
Arena
LMArena Elo
1,412
—
| Metric | Grok 3 | Grok Build 0.1 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Organization | xAI | xAI | — |
| Family | Grok | Grok | — |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | — |
| Open weights | No | No | — |
| Release | Feb 17, 2025 | Jul 1, 2026 | — |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - | — |
| API / provider | xAI | xAI | — |
| Modalities | text, image → text | text → text | — |
| Specs | |||
| Context window | 131K | 256K | B +125K |
| Max output | 33K | 64K | B +31K |
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Pricing | |||
| Input $/1M | $3 | $1 | B +$2 |
| Output $/1M | $15 | $2 | B +$13 |
| Blended $/1M (3∶1) | $6 | $1.25 | B +$4.75 |
| Speed | |||
| tok/s | 75 | 120 | B +45 |
| TTFT (s) | 0.45 | 0.28 | B +0.17 |
| Reasoning | |||
| MMLU-Pro | 79.9 | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 69.3 | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1 | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | 58.0 | — | — |
| MATH-500 | 87.0 | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | — | — | — |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy | 28.9 | — | — |
| AA-LCR v1.1 | 58.0 | — | — |
| CritPt | — | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | — | — | — |
| IFBench | 46.9 | — | — |
| Chartography | — | — | — |
| Chartography (With Tools) | — | — | — |
| Coding | |||
| SWE-bench Verified | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 42.5 | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | — | — | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3 | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3 | — | — | — |
| BigCodeBench | — | — | — |
| SciCode | 36.8 | — | — |
| CursorBench | — | — | — |
| SWE-Rebench | — | — | — |
| NL2Repo-Bench | — | — | — |
| DeepSWE | — | — | — |
| WebDev Arena | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| CursorBench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) | — | — | — |
| Arena | |||
| LMArena Elo | 1,412 | — | — |
Grok 3
- Context
- 131K / 33K out
- Parameters
- —
- Price
- $3 / $15
- Speed
- 75 tok/s · 0.45s TTFT
- Modalities
- text, image → text
- License
- Proprietary
Previous-gen Grok flagship; retained for API compatibility and real-time X context.
Grok Build 0.1
- Context
- 256K / 64K out
- Parameters
- —
- Price
- $1 / $2
- Speed
- 120 tok/s · 0.28s TTFT
- Modalities
- text → text
- License
- Proprietary
xAI coding/build-oriented SKU at $1/$2 with 256k context (long-context rates above 200k prompts).
Benchmark charts
Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.
These two models have no overlapping published benchmarks in our dataset. Compare specs and pricing instead.