vs
0:2
overall capability wins (1 ties across 3 scored). Granite 4.1 8B leads overall.
- Pricing2:1
- Speed1:1
- Specs0:2
Verdict
Granite 4.1 8B offers larger context (131K vs 128K); Granite 4.0 H Micro is ~1.5x cheaper on a blended token basis than Granite 4.1 8B.
- Granite 4.1 8B offers larger context (131K vs 128K)
- Granite 4.0 H Micro is ~1.5x cheaper on a blended token basis than Granite 4.1 8B
Cost for 1M in + 250K out
Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.
- Granite 4.0 H Micro
- $0.04
- Granite 4.1 8B
- $0.08
Granite 4.0 H Micro is about 1.7x cheaper on this workload.
Price per 1M tokens
Full comparison
Organization
IBM
IBM
Family
Granite
Granite
License
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Yes
Yes
Release
Oct 2, 2025
Apr 30, 2026
Knowledge cutoff
-
-
API / provider
IBM watsonx
IBM watsonx
Modalities
text → text
text → text
Specs
Context window
128K
131K
Max output
8K
8K
Parameters
3B
8B
Pricing
Input $/1M
$0.02
$0.05
Output $/1M
$0.11
$0.10
Blended $/1M (3∶1)
$0.04
$0.06
Speed
tok/s
180
117
TTFT (s)
0.15
0.13
Reasoning
MMLU-Pro
—
—
GPQA Diamond
—
43.3
Humanity's Last Exam
—
3.8
AIME 2025
—
—
MATH-500
—
—
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
—
—
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
—
12.3
AA-LCR v1.1
—
13.3
CritPt
—
—
MMMU-Pro
—
—
IFBench
—
38.6
Chartography
—
—
Chartography (With Tools)
—
—
Coding
SWE-bench Verified
—
—
SWE-bench Pro
—
—
SWE-bench Multilingual
—
—
LiveCodeBench
—
—
Terminal-Bench 2.1
—
3.4
Aider Polyglot
—
—
Terminal-Bench 3
—
—
BigCodeBench
—
—
SciCode
—
21.8
CursorBench
—
—
SWE-Rebench
—
—
NL2Repo-Bench
—
—
DeepSWE
—
—
WebDev Arena
—
1,192
Terminal-Bench 4.0
—
—
CursorBench 4.0
—
—
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)
—
—
Arena
LMArena Elo
—
1,306
| Metric | Granite 4.0 H Micro | Granite 4.1 8B | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Organization | IBM | IBM | — |
| Family | Granite | Granite | — |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | — |
| Release | Oct 2, 2025 | Apr 30, 2026 | — |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - | — |
| API / provider | IBM watsonx | IBM watsonx | — |
| Modalities | text → text | text → text | — |
| Specs | |||
| Context window | 128K | 131K | B +3K |
| Max output | 8K | 8K | tie |
| Parameters | 3B | 8B | B +5.00 |
| Pricing | |||
| Input $/1M | $0.02 | $0.05 | A +$0.03 |
| Output $/1M | $0.11 | $0.10 | B +$0.01 |
| Blended $/1M (3∶1) | $0.04 | $0.06 | A +$0.02 |
| Speed | |||
| tok/s | 180 | 117 | A +63 |
| TTFT (s) | 0.15 | 0.13 | B +0.02 |
| Reasoning | |||
| MMLU-Pro | — | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 43.3 | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 3.8 | — |
| AIME 2025 | — | — | — |
| MATH-500 | — | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | — | — | — |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy | — | 12.3 | — |
| AA-LCR v1.1 | — | 13.3 | — |
| CritPt | — | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | — | — | — |
| IFBench | — | 38.6 | — |
| Chartography | — | — | — |
| Chartography (With Tools) | — | — | — |
| Coding | |||
| SWE-bench Verified | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | — | 3.4 | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3 | — | — | — |
| BigCodeBench | — | — | — |
| SciCode | — | 21.8 | — |
| CursorBench | — | — | — |
| SWE-Rebench | — | — | — |
| NL2Repo-Bench | — | — | — |
| DeepSWE | — | — | — |
| WebDev Arena | — | 1,192 | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| CursorBench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) | — | — | — |
| Arena | |||
| LMArena Elo | — | 1,306 | — |
Granite 4.0 H Micro
- Context
- 128K / 8K out
- Parameters
- 3B
- Price
- $0.02 / $0.11
- Speed
- 180 tok/s · 0.15s TTFT
- Modalities
- text → text
- License
- Apache 2.0
Tiny hybrid Granite 4.0 for edge and RAG — ultra-low watsonx list pricing.
Granite 4.1 8B
- Context
- 131K / 8K out
- Parameters
- 8B
- Price
- $0.05 / $0.10
- Speed
- 117 tok/s · 0.13s TTFT
- Modalities
- text → text
- License
- Apache 2.0
Token-efficient IBM enterprise 8B with tool calling and fill-in-the-middle code support under Apache 2.0.
Benchmark charts
Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.
These two models have no overlapping published benchmarks in our dataset. Compare specs and pricing instead.