vs
0:2
overall capability wins (0 ties across 2 scored). Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads overall.
- Specs0:2
Verdict
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber offers larger context (1.0M vs 1M); Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber allows ~8.0x more max output (66K vs 8K).
- Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber offers larger context (1.0M vs 1M)
- Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber allows ~8.0x more max output (66K vs 8K)
Cost for 1M in + 250K out
Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.
- Gemini 2.0 Flash
- $0.20
- Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
- -
Price per 1M tokens
Full comparison
Organization
Family
Gemini
Gemini
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Open weights
No
No
Release
Dec 11, 2024
Sep 2, 2026
Knowledge cutoff
-
-
API / provider
No primary API price listed
Modalities
text, image, audio, video → text
text → text
Specs
Context window
1M
1.0M
Max output
8K
66K
Parameters
—
—
Pricing
Input $/1M
$0.10
—
Output $/1M
$0.40
—
Blended $/1M (3∶1)
$0.18
-
Speed
tok/s
180
-
TTFT (s)
0.2
-
Reasoning
MMLU-Pro
—
—
GPQA Diamond
62.3
—
Humanity's Last Exam
4.3
—
AIME 2025
—
—
MATH-500
—
—
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
—
—
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
23.5
—
AA-LCR v1.1
31.3
—
CritPt
—
—
MMMU-Pro
—
—
IFBench
40.2
—
Chartography
—
—
Chartography (With Tools)
—
—
Coding
SWE-bench Verified
13.5
—
SWE-bench Pro
—
—
SWE-bench Multilingual
—
—
LiveCodeBench
—
—
Terminal-Bench 2.1
—
—
Aider Polyglot
—
—
Terminal-Bench 3
—
—
BigCodeBench
—
—
SciCode
33.3
—
CursorBench
—
—
SWE-Rebench
9.1
—
NL2Repo-Bench
—
—
DeepSWE
—
—
WebDev Arena
—
—
Terminal-Bench 4.0
—
—
CursorBench 4.0
—
—
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)
—
—
Arena
LMArena Elo
1,360
—
| Metric | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Organization | — | ||
| Family | Gemini | Gemini | — |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | — |
| Open weights | No | No | — |
| Release | Dec 11, 2024 | Sep 2, 2026 | — |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - | — |
| API / provider | No primary API price listed | — | |
| Modalities | text, image, audio, video → text | text → text | — |
| Specs | |||
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M | B +49K |
| Max output | 8K | 66K | B +57K |
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Pricing | |||
| Input $/1M | $0.10 | — | — |
| Output $/1M | $0.40 | — | — |
| Blended $/1M (3∶1) | $0.18 | - | — |
| Speed | |||
| tok/s | 180 | - | — |
| TTFT (s) | 0.2 | - | — |
| Reasoning | |||
| MMLU-Pro | — | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | 62.3 | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.3 | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | — | — | — |
| MATH-500 | — | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | — | — | — |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy | 23.5 | — | — |
| AA-LCR v1.1 | 31.3 | — | — |
| CritPt | — | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | — | — | — |
| IFBench | 40.2 | — | — |
| Chartography | — | — | — |
| Chartography (With Tools) | — | — | — |
| Coding | |||
| SWE-bench Verified | 13.5 | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | — | — | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3 | — | — | — |
| BigCodeBench | — | — | — |
| SciCode | 33.3 | — | — |
| CursorBench | — | — | — |
| SWE-Rebench | 9.1 | — | — |
| NL2Repo-Bench | — | — | — |
| DeepSWE | — | — | — |
| WebDev Arena | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| CursorBench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) | — | — | — |
| Arena | |||
| LMArena Elo | 1,360 | — | — |
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- Context
- 1M / 8K out
- Parameters
- —
- Price
- $0.10 / $0.40
- Speed
- 180 tok/s · 0.2s TTFT
- Modalities
- text, image, audio, video → text
- License
- Proprietary
Agentic multimodal Flash that introduced native tool use and image generation in the Gemini API.
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
- Context
- 1.0M / 66K out
- Parameters
- —
- Price
- —
- Speed
- —
- Modalities
- text → text
- License
- Proprietary
Cybersecurity-specialized Gemini 3.8 Flash fine-tune for autonomous vulnerability discovery and automated patching - limited to the Fairwind Program for governments, critical-infrastructure operators, and trusted software maintainers (no public API).
Benchmark charts
Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.
These two models have no overlapping published benchmarks in our dataset. Compare specs and pricing instead.