LLMcompare

Search

Search for a command to run...

A · closed · Composer

Composer 2.5

Cursor

B · closed · Grok

Cursor Grok 4.5

Cursor

0:3

overall capability wins (0 ties across 3 scored). Cursor Grok 4.5 leads overall.

  • Coding0:1
  • Pricing3:0
  • Speed1:1
  • Specs0:2

Verdict

Cursor Grok 4.5 leads coding (widest gap: +10.6 on CursorBench); Cursor Grok 4.5 offers ~2.5x larger context (500K vs 200K); Cursor Grok 4.5 allows ~2.0x more max output (128K vs 64K).

  • Cursor Grok 4.5 leads coding (widest gap: +10.6 on CursorBench)
  • Cursor Grok 4.5 offers ~2.5x larger context (500K vs 200K)
  • Cursor Grok 4.5 allows ~2.0x more max output (128K vs 64K)
  • Composer 2.5 is ~3.0x cheaper on a blended token basis than Cursor Grok 4.5

Cost for 1M in + 250K out

Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.

Composer 2.5
$1.13
Cursor Grok 4.5
$3.50

Composer 2.5 is about 3.1x cheaper on this workload.

Price per 1M tokens

Full comparison

Organization

Cursor

Cursor

Family

Composer

Grok

License

Proprietary

Proprietary

Open weights

No

No

Release

May 18, 2026

Jul 9, 2026

Knowledge cutoff

-

-

API / provider

Cursor

Cursor

Modalities

text → text

text, image → text

Specs

Context window

200K

500K

B +300K

Max output

64K

128K

B +64K

Parameters

—

—

—

Pricing

Input $/1M

$0.50

$2

A +$1.50

Output $/1M

$2.50

$6

A +$3.50

Blended $/1M (3∶1)

$1

$3

A +$2

Speed

tok/s

90

95

B +5.00

TTFT (s)

0.35

0.4

A +0.05

Reasoning

MMLU-Pro

—

—

—

GPQA Diamond

—

—

—

Humanity's Last Exam

—

—

—

AIME 2025

—

—

—

MATH-500

—

—

—

Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)

—

—

—

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

—

—

—

AA-LCR v1.1

—

—

—

CritPt

—

—

—

MMMU-Pro

—

—

—

IFBench

—

—

—

Chartography

—

—

—

Chartography (With Tools)

—

—

—

Coding

SWE-bench Verified

—

—

—

SWE-bench Pro

—

—

—

SWE-bench Multilingual

79.8

—

—

LiveCodeBench

—

—

—

Terminal-Bench 2.1

—

—

—

Aider Polyglot

—

—

—

Terminal-Bench 3

—

—

—

BigCodeBench

—

—

—

SciCode

—

—

—

CursorBench

56.1

66.7

B +10.6 pts

SWE-Rebench

—

—

—

NL2Repo-Bench

—

—

—

DeepSWE

—

—

—

WebDev Arena

—

—

—

Terminal-Bench 4.0

—

—

—

CursorBench 4.0

—

—

—

FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)

—

—

—

Arena

LMArena Elo

—

—

—

Composer 2.5

Context
200K / 64K out
Parameters
—
Price
$0.50 / $2.50
Speed
90 tok/s · 0.35s TTFT
Modalities
text → text
License
Proprietary

Cursor's own agentic coding model (standard tier) — Cursor reports 69.3% Terminal-Bench 2.0 and 79.8% SWE-bench Multilingual; draws from the Cursor Models usage pool at $0.50/$2.50.

Cursor Grok 4.5

Context
500K / 128K out
Parameters
—
Price
$2 / $6
Speed
95 tok/s · 0.4s TTFT
Modalities
text, image → text
License
Proprietary

Cursor's flagship - jointly trained with SpaceXAI on Cursor agent data; effort levels (low/medium/high) for hard long-running work. Distinct from the public xAI Grok 4.5 API SKU.

Benchmark charts

Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.

Coding

CursorBench: B +10.6

Pick a different pair · Back to catalog