vs
0:2
overall capability wins (0 ties across 2 scored). Command A Vision leads overall.
- Pricing3:0
- Speed1:0
- Specs0:2
Verdict
Command A Vision offers ~31.3x larger context (128K vs 4K); Command A Vision allows ~2.0x more max output (8K vs 4K); Command is ~3.5x cheaper on a blended token basis than Command A Vision.
- Command A Vision offers ~31.3x larger context (128K vs 4K)
- Command A Vision allows ~2.0x more max output (8K vs 4K)
- Command is ~3.5x cheaper on a blended token basis than Command A Vision
Cost for 1M in + 250K out
Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.
- Command
- $1.50
- Command A Vision
- $5
Command is about 3.3x cheaper on this workload.
Price per 1M tokens
Full comparison
Organization
Cohere
Cohere
Family
Command
Command
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Open weights
No
No
Release
Mar 1, 2023
Jul 1, 2025
Knowledge cutoff
-
-
API / provider
Cohere
Cohere
Modalities
text → text
text, image → text
Specs
Context window
4K
128K
Max output
4K
8K
Parameters
—
—
Pricing
Input $/1M
$1
$2.50
Output $/1M
$2
$10
Blended $/1M (3∶1)
$1.25
$4.38
Speed
tok/s
70
70
TTFT (s)
0.4
0.5
Reasoning
MMLU-Pro
—
—
GPQA Diamond
—
—
Humanity's Last Exam
—
—
AIME 2025
—
—
MATH-500
—
—
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
—
—
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
—
—
AA-LCR v1.1
—
—
CritPt
—
—
MMMU-Pro
—
—
IFBench
—
—
Chartography
—
—
Chartography (With Tools)
—
—
Coding
SWE-bench Verified
—
—
SWE-bench Pro
—
—
SWE-bench Multilingual
—
—
LiveCodeBench
—
—
Terminal-Bench 2.1
—
—
Aider Polyglot
—
—
Terminal-Bench 3
—
—
BigCodeBench
—
—
SciCode
—
—
CursorBench
—
—
SWE-Rebench
—
—
NL2Repo-Bench
—
—
DeepSWE
—
—
WebDev Arena
—
—
Terminal-Bench 4.0
—
—
CursorBench 4.0
—
—
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)
—
—
Arena
LMArena Elo
—
—
| Metric | Command | Command A Vision | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Organization | Cohere | Cohere | — |
| Family | Command | Command | — |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | — |
| Open weights | No | No | — |
| Release | Mar 1, 2023 | Jul 1, 2025 | — |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - | — |
| API / provider | Cohere | Cohere | — |
| Modalities | text → text | text, image → text | — |
| Specs | |||
| Context window | 4K | 128K | B +124K |
| Max output | 4K | 8K | B +4K |
| Parameters | — | — | — |
| Pricing | |||
| Input $/1M | $1 | $2.50 | A +$1.50 |
| Output $/1M | $2 | $10 | A +$8 |
| Blended $/1M (3∶1) | $1.25 | $4.38 | A +$3.13 |
| Speed | |||
| tok/s | 70 | 70 | tie |
| TTFT (s) | 0.4 | 0.5 | A +0.10 |
| Reasoning | |||
| MMLU-Pro | — | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | — | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | — | — | — |
| MATH-500 | — | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | — | — | — |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy | — | — | — |
| AA-LCR v1.1 | — | — | — |
| CritPt | — | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | — | — | — |
| IFBench | — | — | — |
| Chartography | — | — | — |
| Chartography (With Tools) | — | — | — |
| Coding | |||
| SWE-bench Verified | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | — | — | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3 | — | — | — |
| BigCodeBench | — | — | — |
| SciCode | — | — | — |
| CursorBench | — | — | — |
| SWE-Rebench | — | — | — |
| NL2Repo-Bench | — | — | — |
| DeepSWE | — | — | — |
| WebDev Arena | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| CursorBench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) | — | — | — |
| Arena | |||
| LMArena Elo | — | — | — |
Command
- Context
- 4K / 4K out
- Parameters
- —
- Price
- $1 / $2
- Speed
- 70 tok/s · 0.4s TTFT
- Modalities
- text → text
- License
- Proprietary
Original Cohere Command API model — early enterprise RAG/chat baseline before Command R / R+ / A.
Command A Vision
- Context
- 128K / 8K out
- Parameters
- —
- Price
- $2.50 / $10
- Speed
- 70 tok/s · 0.5s TTFT
- Modalities
- text, image → text
- License
- Proprietary
Cohere multimodal Command A variant for charts, diagrams, OCR, and document Q&A in enterprise RAG pipelines.
Benchmark charts
Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.
These two models have no overlapping published benchmarks in our dataset. Compare specs and pricing instead.