LLMcompare

Search

Search for a command to run...

A · closed · Claude Opus

Claude Opus 5

Anthropic

B · closed · Composer

Composer 2.5

Cursor

3:0

overall capability wins (0 ties across 3 scored). Claude Opus 5 leads overall.

  • Coding1:0
  • Pricing0:3
  • Speed0:2
  • Specs2:0

Verdict

Claude Opus 5 leads coding (widest gap: +13.9 on CursorBench); Claude Opus 5 offers ~5.0x larger context (1M vs 200K); Claude Opus 5 allows ~2.0x more max output (128K vs 64K).

  • Claude Opus 5 leads coding (widest gap: +13.9 on CursorBench)
  • Claude Opus 5 offers ~5.0x larger context (1M vs 200K)
  • Claude Opus 5 allows ~2.0x more max output (128K vs 64K)
  • Composer 2.5 is ~10.0x cheaper on a blended token basis than Claude Opus 5

Cost for 1M in + 250K out

Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.

Claude Opus 5
$11.25
Composer 2.5
$1.13

Composer 2.5 is about 10.0x cheaper on this workload.

Price per 1M tokens

Full comparison

Organization

Anthropic

Cursor

Family

Claude Opus

Composer

License

Proprietary

Proprietary

Open weights

No

No

Release

Jul 24, 2026

May 18, 2026

Knowledge cutoff

-

-

API / provider

Anthropic

Cursor

Modalities

text, image → text

text → text

Specs

Context window

1M

200K

A +800K

Max output

128K

64K

A +64K

Parameters

—

—

—

Pricing

Input $/1M

$5

$0.50

B +$4.50

Output $/1M

$25

$2.50

B +$22.50

Blended $/1M (3∶1)

$10

$1

B +$9

Speed

tok/s

72

90

B +18

TTFT (s)

0.55

0.35

B +0.20

Reasoning

MMLU-Pro

—

—

—

GPQA Diamond

93.2

—

—

Humanity's Last Exam

54.9

—

—

AIME 2025

—

—

—

MATH-500

—

—

—

Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)

—

—

—

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

60.9

—

—

AA-LCR v1.1

79.3

—

—

CritPt

29.1

—

—

MMMU-Pro

84.7

—

—

IFBench

—

—

—

Chartography

—

—

—

Chartography (With Tools)

—

—

—

Coding

SWE-bench Verified

—

—

—

SWE-bench Pro

—

—

—

SWE-bench Multilingual

—

79.8

—

LiveCodeBench

—

—

—

Terminal-Bench 2.1

89.1

—

—

Aider Polyglot

—

—

—

Terminal-Bench 3

42.7

—

—

BigCodeBench

—

—

—

SciCode

56.4

—

—

CursorBench

70.0

56.1

A +13.9 pts

SWE-Rebench

63.4

—

—

NL2Repo-Bench

—

—

—

DeepSWE

73.7

—

—

WebDev Arena

1,687

—

—

Terminal-Bench 4.0

51.8

—

—

CursorBench 4.0

—

—

—

FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)

—

—

—

Arena

LMArena Elo

1,493

—

—

Claude Opus 5

Context
1M / 128K out
Parameters
—
Price
$5 / $25
Speed
72 tok/s · 0.55s TTFT
Modalities
text, image → text
License
Proprietary

Anthropic's July 2026 flagship - top Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and strong agentic coding at Opus 4.8 pricing.

Composer 2.5

Context
200K / 64K out
Parameters
—
Price
$0.50 / $2.50
Speed
90 tok/s · 0.35s TTFT
Modalities
text → text
License
Proprietary

Cursor's own agentic coding model (standard tier) — Cursor reports 69.3% Terminal-Bench 2.0 and 79.8% SWE-bench Multilingual; draws from the Cursor Models usage pool at $0.50/$2.50.

Benchmark charts

Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.

Coding

CursorBench: A +13.9

Pick a different pair · Back to catalog