LLMcompare

Search

Search for a command to run...

A · open · Other

Atria Dawn Preview

Shanghai AI Lab

B · open · Other

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Liquid AI

3:0

overall capability wins (0 ties across 3 scored). Atria Dawn Preview leads overall.

  • Specs3:0

Verdict

Atria Dawn Preview offers ~7.8x larger context (256K vs 33K); Atria Dawn Preview allows ~8.0x more max output (66K vs 8K).

  • Atria Dawn Preview offers ~7.8x larger context (256K vs 33K)
  • Atria Dawn Preview allows ~8.0x more max output (66K vs 8K)

Cost for 1M in + 250K out

Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.

Atria Dawn Preview
-
LFM2.5-8B-A1B
$0.06

Price per 1M tokens

Full comparison

Organization

Shanghai AI Lab

Liquid AI

Family

Other

Other

License

MIT

LFM License

Open weights

Yes

Yes

Release

Sep 11, 2026

Jan 20, 2026

Knowledge cutoff

-

-

API / provider

No primary API price listed

Liquid AI

Modalities

text → text

text → text

Specs

Context window

256K

33K

A +223K

Max output

66K

8K

A +57K

Parameters

744B

8B (1B act.)

A +736

Pricing

Input $/1M

—

$0.03

—

Output $/1M

—

$0.12

—

Blended $/1M (3∶1)

-

$0.05

—

Speed

tok/s

-

160

—

TTFT (s)

-

0.18

—

Reasoning

MMLU-Pro

—

—

—

GPQA Diamond

—

51.3

—

Humanity's Last Exam

—

6.9

—

AIME 2025

—

—

—

MATH-500

—

—

—

Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)

—

—

—

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

—

9.3

—

AA-LCR v1.1

—

—

—

CritPt

—

—

—

MMMU-Pro

—

—

—

IFBench

—

55.6

—

Chartography

—

—

—

Chartography (With Tools)

—

—

—

Coding

SWE-bench Verified

—

—

—

SWE-bench Pro

59.6

—

—

SWE-bench Multilingual

—

—

—

LiveCodeBench

—

—

—

Terminal-Bench 2.1

—

—

—

Aider Polyglot

—

—

—

Terminal-Bench 3

—

—

—

BigCodeBench

—

—

—

SciCode

—

7.8

—

CursorBench

—

—

—

SWE-Rebench

—

—

—

NL2Repo-Bench

—

—

—

DeepSWE

—

—

—

WebDev Arena

—

—

—

Terminal-Bench 4.0

—

—

—

CursorBench 4.0

—

—

—

FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)

—

—

—

Arena

LMArena Elo

—

—

—

Atria Dawn Preview

Context
256K / 66K out
Parameters
744B
Price
—
Speed
—
Modalities
text → text
License
MIT

Shanghai AI Laboratory's open-weight agentic MoE (744B total, MIT license, 256K context), built on a GLM-5.2 base and trained by the cross-institutional ATRIA initiative (with Fudan NLP Lab) for long-horizon research and engineering workflows: problem analysis, tool use, code, experiments, and failure recovery. Benchmark scores are from the model's own technical report and have not yet been independently verified by a third-party evaluator.

LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Context
33K / 8K out
Parameters
8B (1B act.)
Price
$0.03 / $0.12
Speed
160 tok/s · 0.18s TTFT
Modalities
text → text
License
LFM License

Liquid Foundation Model sparse MoE — efficient open edge/chat model from Liquid AI.

Benchmark charts

Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.

These two models have no overlapping published benchmarks in our dataset. Compare specs and pricing instead.

Pick a different pair · Back to catalog