vs
2:0
overall capability wins (0 ties across 2 scored). Atria Dawn Preview leads overall.
- Specs2:0
Verdict
Atria Dawn Preview offers ~2.0x larger context (256K vs 131K).
Cost for 1M in + 250K out
Illustrative chat workload at primary-provider list prices.
- Atria Dawn Preview
- -
- K2 Think V2
- -
Price per 1M tokens
Full comparison
Organization
Shanghai AI Lab
MBZUAI / G42 / LLM360
Family
Other
Other
License
MIT
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Yes
Yes
Release
Sep 11, 2026
Jan 27, 2026
Knowledge cutoff
-
-
API / provider
No primary API price listed
No primary API price listed
Modalities
text → text
text → text
Specs
Context window
256K
131K
Max output
66K
-
Parameters
744B
70B
Pricing
Input $/1M
—
—
Output $/1M
—
—
Blended $/1M (3∶1)
-
-
Speed
tok/s
-
-
TTFT (s)
-
-
Reasoning
MMLU-Pro
—
—
GPQA Diamond
—
71.3
Humanity's Last Exam
—
10.1
AIME 2025
—
—
MATH-500
—
—
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)
—
—
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
—
18.0
AA-LCR v1.1
—
57.0
CritPt
—
—
MMMU-Pro
—
—
IFBench
—
62.8
Chartography
—
—
Chartography (With Tools)
—
—
Coding
SWE-bench Verified
—
—
SWE-bench Pro
59.6
—
SWE-bench Multilingual
—
—
LiveCodeBench
—
—
Terminal-Bench 2.1
—
15.0
Aider Polyglot
—
—
Terminal-Bench 3
—
—
BigCodeBench
—
—
SciCode
—
—
CursorBench
—
—
SWE-Rebench
—
—
NL2Repo-Bench
—
—
DeepSWE
—
—
WebDev Arena
—
—
Terminal-Bench 4.0
—
—
CursorBench 4.0
—
—
FrontierCode v1.1 (Main)
—
—
Arena
LMArena Elo
—
—
| Metric | Atria Dawn Preview | K2 Think V2 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Organization | Shanghai AI Lab | MBZUAI / G42 / LLM360 | — |
| Family | Other | Other | — |
| License | MIT | Apache 2.0 | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | — |
| Release | Sep 11, 2026 | Jan 27, 2026 | — |
| Knowledge cutoff | - | - | — |
| API / provider | No primary API price listed | No primary API price listed | — |
| Modalities | text → text | text → text | — |
| Specs | |||
| Context window | 256K | 131K | A +125K |
| Max output | 66K | - | — |
| Parameters | 744B | 70B | A +674 |
| Pricing | |||
| Input $/1M | — | — | — |
| Output $/1M | — | — | — |
| Blended $/1M (3∶1) | - | - | — |
| Speed | |||
| tok/s | - | - | — |
| TTFT (s) | - | - | — |
| Reasoning | |||
| MMLU-Pro | — | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 71.3 | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 10.1 | — |
| AIME 2025 | — | — | — |
| MATH-500 | — | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | — | — | — |
| AA-Omniscience Accuracy | — | 18.0 | — |
| AA-LCR v1.1 | — | 57.0 | — |
| CritPt | — | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | — | — | — |
| IFBench | — | 62.8 | — |
| Chartography | — | — | — |
| Chartography (With Tools) | — | — | — |
| Coding | |||
| SWE-bench Verified | — | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | 59.6 | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | — | 15.0 | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3 | — | — | — |
| BigCodeBench | — | — | — |
| SciCode | — | — | — |
| CursorBench | — | — | — |
| SWE-Rebench | — | — | — |
| NL2Repo-Bench | — | — | — |
| DeepSWE | — | — | — |
| WebDev Arena | — | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| CursorBench 4.0 | — | — | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) | — | — | — |
| Arena | |||
| LMArena Elo | — | — | — |
Atria Dawn Preview
- Context
- 256K / 66K out
- Parameters
- 744B
- Price
- —
- Speed
- —
- Modalities
- text → text
- License
- MIT
Shanghai AI Laboratory's open-weight agentic MoE (744B total, MIT license, 256K context), built on a GLM-5.2 base and trained by the cross-institutional ATRIA initiative (with Fudan NLP Lab) for long-horizon research and engineering workflows: problem analysis, tool use, code, experiments, and failure recovery. Benchmark scores are from the model's own technical report and have not yet been independently verified by a third-party evaluator.
K2 Think V2
- Context
- 131K
- Parameters
- 70B
- Price
- —
- Speed
- —
- Modalities
- text → text
- License
- Apache 2.0
MBZUAI's Institute of Foundation Models, with G42 and LLM360, fully open 70B dense reasoning model built end-to-end as a 'sovereign' successor to the original K2-Think; no hosted API yet.
Benchmark charts
Winner bars are emphasized. Per-benchmark deltas sit above each chart.
These two models have no overlapping published benchmarks in our dataset. Compare specs and pricing instead.